AI anxiety is pushing college students to reconsider majors

College students say they are changing course as they look for “AI-proof” majors, but they also say the search for safe careers is increasingly difficult because the job market could shift again before they graduate. The concern is especially pronounced for students in technology and vocational tracks, where they feel pressure to develop expertise in AI while also worrying they could be replaced in early-career roles.

Among the students navigating that uncertainty is Josephine Timperman, a 20-year-old at Miami University in Ohio. Two years ago, Timperman planned to major in business analytics, expecting the niche skills she would build in areas such as statistical analysis and coding would help her stand out on a resume. But she later concluded that those basic skills can now be automated, and she began revising her career strategy.

Timperman said “Everyone has a fear that entry-level jobs will be taken by AI,” and a few weeks before the Associated Press story, she switched her major to marketing. Her updated approach keeps analytics as a minor and points her toward building communication and critical thinking skills, which she said she believes remain difficult for AI to replace. Timperman said that she does not just want to learn how to code; she wants the ability to hold conversations, form relationships and think critically.

The Associated Press reporting also highlights a broader advisory gap. Courtney Brown, a vice president at Lumina, said that students are changing majors for many reasons but that the scale of AI-driven concern is unusual. She said “The fact that so many students say it’s because of AI — that is startling,” adding that students feel forced to make these decisions without a reliable “GPS.”

Polling cited in the Associated Press story underscores the anxiety. It reported that a 2025 poll by the Institute of Politics at the Harvard Kennedy School found about 70% of college students see AI as a threat to their job prospects. It also cited Gallup polling indicating rising worries among U.S. workers about being replaced by new technologies.

The reporting notes that uncertainty is not evenly distributed across fields. It says students pursuing degrees in technology and vocational areas feel the need to develop AI expertise but also fear job loss, while students studying healthcare and natural sciences may be less impacted by AI overhauls, according to Gallup. It also cites a Quinnipiac poll finding that most Americans say it is “very” or “somewhat” important for college and university students to be taught how to use AI.

Among the newest concerns in workforce outlooks is how young adults view the tradeoffs. The Associated Press reported that Gallup polling of Generation Z, ages 14 to 29, found about half—48%—of Gen Z workers said the risks of AI in the workforce outweigh possible benefits. It also described skepticism alongside continued use, with about half of Gen Z adults using AI at least weekly.

The story also shows the uncertainty reaching students who are already in AI-adjacent areas such as computer science and data science. Ben Aybar, 22, who graduated last spring from the University of Chicago, said he applied for about 50 jobs, mostly in software engineering, without getting any interviews. He later pivoted to a master’s degree in computer science and picked up part-time work doing AI consulting for companies, and he said people who know how to use AI could be valuable—especially those able to explain complex topics in plain language. Aybar said being able to talk to people and interact in a “very human” way is more valuable than ever.

At the University of Virginia, data science major Ava Lawless described similar uncertainty about whether her field will remain employable by the time she graduates. She said some advisers believe data scientists will be safe because they build AI models, but she said she keeps seeing job reports that indicate otherwise, leaving her worried about the future. Lawless said, “It makes me feel a bit hopeless for the future,” and she raised a specific concern: what if, by graduation, “there’s not even a job market for this anymore?”

Lawless said she is considering switching to studio art, describing the choice as weighing job prospects against personal interest. She said, “I’m at a point where I’m thinking if I can’t get a job being a data scientist, I might as well pursue art.” She added: “Because if I’m going to be unemployed, I might as well do something I love.”

The Associated Press reporting also points to institutional leadership grappling with similar questions. It said that last month at Stanford University, leaders from several prominent universities discussed the future of higher education, including how AI is transforming how students learn and pushing educators to rethink teaching methods. Courtney Brown said universities needed to address what students need to learn to be successful in the job market in 10, 20 and 30 years, and Brown University President Christina Paxson said the group did not have the answer.

Paxson said “And none of us know. We don’t know the answer to that,” adding that she believes communication and critical thinking are important and that the fundamentals of a liberal education may be more important than learning how to code in Java right now.