Body
Senate Republicans voted down a war powers resolution Wednesday aimed at forcing Congress to weigh in before further U.S. attacks against Iran, setting an early marker for how lawmakers intend to oversee a conflict the Trump administration has pursued with no clearly defined exit strategy. The effort came as the war spread across the Middle East and after the administration began moving quickly to win lawmakers’ support.
The resolution failed on a 47–53 vote, with the tally largely splitting along party lines. The vote offered a contrast among lawmakers: Republican Sen. Rand Paul supported the measure, while Democratic Sen. John Fetterman opposed it.
Before the vote, Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer told colleagues that the Senate would be compelled to choose, saying “Today every senator — every single one — will pick a side.” In his framing, the choice was between supporting Americans who, as he put it, were “exhausted with forever wars in the Middle East,” and backing “Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth” in what he described as a move that would “bumble us headfirst into another war.”
Senate debate also featured prominent Republican remarks. Sen. John Barrasso said GOP senators were sending a message that Democrats were wrong to force the war powers resolution to a vote, and he added, “Democrats would rather obstruct Donald Trump than obliterate Iran’s national nuclear program.”
While lawmakers weighed the measure, the administration was also working the Capitol. After launching what the AP described as a surprise attack against Iran on Saturday, Trump officials took frequent trips to Capitol Hill to reassure lawmakers that the administration had the situation under control, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth telling reporters Wednesday that the conflict could extend eight weeks—longer than a timeframe previously floated by the administration. Hegseth also said that Iran remained able to carry out missile attacks even as the U.S. sought to control Iran’s airspace.
Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said U.S. service members “remain in harm’s way,” adding that “we must be clear-eyed that the risk is still high.” The Senate vote followed reports that six U.S. military members had been killed over the weekend in a drone strike in Kuwait.
Senators linked the resolution to the human cost of the war. Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa acknowledged the stakes in a floor speech, saying two of the soldiers killed Sunday were from Iowa and that an Iowa National Guard unit attacked in Syria in December had resulted in two additional soldier deaths. Ernst said, “But now is our opportunity to bring an end to the decades of chaos,” adding, “The sooner the better.”
Other remarks during the debate pointed to uncertainty about what the war could become. Trump has not ruled out sending U.S. ground troops, and he has said he hopes to end the bombing campaign within a few weeks, while his goals for the war have changed from seeking regime change to stopping Iran from developing nuclear capabilities and then to crippling Iran’s navy and missile programs. After the vote, Democratic Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware warned in a floor speech about opening what he described as a door to chaos, saying, “We should be careful about opening a door into chaos in the Middle East when we cannot see the other side of it,” and he added that he was praying for “grace to find a path forward together where more do not needlessly join those who have already fallen in this new war in the Middle East.”
The Senate’s actions came alongside continuing congressional debate over Iran, with the AP describing the week’s votes as markers for where lawmakers stood ahead of midterm elections. Sen. Tim Kaine, the Virginia Democrat leading the resolution, said, “Nobody gets to hide and give the president an easy pass or an end-run around the Constitution,” and he tied the measure to a requirement that the administration seek congressional approval rather than proceed on its own.
Republican leaders had previously defeated a series of war powers resolutions tied to other conflicts Trump has entered or threatened to enter, but they also argued that this particular vote involved a conflict already underway. Sen. Susan Collins said that passing the resolution now would send “the wrong message to Iran and to our troops,” and she said that “at this juncture, providing unequivocal support to our service members is critically important, as is ongoing consultation by the administration with Congress.”
The push and pull over war powers also continued in the House, where the AP reported that lawmakers debated a separate resolution presented by GOP leadership ahead of a Thursday vote. The House debate included remarks from GOP Rep. Brian Mast, the Foreign Affairs Committee chairman, who publicly thanked Trump for taking action against Iran and said the president was using his constitutional authority to defend the U.S. against what he called Iran’s “imminent threat.”
On the Democratic side, Rep. Gregory Meeks—top Democrat on the Foreign Affairs panel—said he faced the hardest votes of his time deciding whether to send U.S. troops to war, saying “Our young men and women’s lives are on the line.” AP reported that in earlier closed-door briefings late Tuesday with Trump officials, Meeks later emerged speaking about the decision’s cost, and other Democratic veterans discussed the burdens of earlier U.S. wars.
Rep. Jason Crow, a Democrat from Colorado, said that when Washington “bang[s] the war drums” and speaks about “the costs of war,” it often does not, in his view, describe those costs as being borne by political leaders’ children. He said, “I learned when I was fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan, that when elites in Washington bang the war drums, pound their chest, talk about the costs of war and act tough, they’re not talking about them doing it, they’re not talking about their kids,” adding: “They’re talking about working class kids like us.”