ROME — Claims that a marble bust of Christ in a Roman church is the work of Michelangelo have unsettled Renaissance experts ahead of major public programming tied to the 550th anniversary of his birth. Valentina Salerno, an independent researcher who says she traced her conclusion to archival documents, announced the latest “rediscovery” at a news conference on Wednesday. She argues that the bust — currently listed by Italy’s Culture Ministry as anonymous in the Roman school of the 16th century — can be attributed to the Renaissance master.
The church that oversees the work did not dispute the authenticity question, but said its priority is protecting the object as part of Italy’s cultural heritage. The Rev. Franco Bergamin, abbot of the order that runs the Basilica of Sant’Agnese Fuori le Mura, said the Culture Ministry was invited to participate in Salerno’s news conference but did not attend. The Carabinieri’s art squad declined to weigh in on whether the statue is by Michelangelo, but said it was being protected, and a laminated sign now placed at the sculpture reads: “Alarm armed,” according to the report.
Salerno’s claim centers on a bust of Christ at Sant’Agnese Fuori le Mura. In her account, the attribution stands in contrast to earlier descriptions: she said a head at the church had been suggested by earlier observers, but that later scholarship wrongly rejected the Michelangelo link. She pointed to a 1996 article by Michelangelo expert William Wallace in ArtNews that discussed long-misattributed works and quoted the 19th century author Stendhal writing that at Sant’Agnese they had noticed a head of the savior that Stendhal “should swear is by Michelangelo,” while noting that later cataloging did not take the attribution seriously.
In the weeks leading up to her announcement, Salerno’s thesis has circulated through non-peer-reviewed academic channels as well as through mainstream coverage. She said she had published the theory on academia.edu and that her work was based on documentary research, including wills, inventories and notarized documents held in church and state archives and in the archives of Roman confraternities. Salerno also has suggested a larger pattern of “rediscoveries,” saying there is documentary evidence supporting additional Michelangelo attributions beyond the bust she presented Wednesday.
Her announcement added a new element to the story by tying the bust’s claimed authorship to Michelangelo’s close relationships. Salerno suggested the bust was modeled on Michelangelo’s intimate friend, Tomaso De’ Cavalieri, and argued that it was part of the inheritance Michelangelo left in his final years for his friends and students. She further described — based on her research published on academia.edu — evidence of a secret “pact of indissolubility” among some of Michelangelo’s students and their heirs, including what she said was the previously unknown existence of a chamber with locks that could be opened with three keys held by three different students.
While she made detailed claims about what her research documents, leading experts have largely withheld comment, the report said. It also noted that the Vatican appeared, at least initially, to be interested in the attribution, in part because Cardinal Mauro Gambetti — who runs St. Peter’s Basilica — named Salerno and her mentor to a scientific committee formed in 2025 to consider a possible Vatican exhibition to commemorate Michelangelo’s birth. The committee’s work has not produced an exhibition yet, and the report said some members downplayed the significance of Salerno’s work or refused to discuss it.
Several of the committee’s prominent names declined engagement when contacted. The report said Barbara Jatta, director of the Vatican Museums, distanced herself from the committee’s work, saying she was named to it but that it was Gambetti’s project. The British Museum declined to make Hugo Chapman available for comment, Gambetti’s office did not respond to a request, and other committee members also declined to comment, according to the report. Against that backdrop, Wallace — who has argued in the past about wrongly attributing works to Michelangelo — told the Associated Press that Salerno’s methodology was sound and that there is a strong tradition in Europe of noncredentialed researchers doing solid work.
Wallace nonetheless disputed key parts of Salerno’s conclusions. The report said he agreed with her thesis that Michelangelo did not destroy his works in a fire — a belief that Wallace said scholars have debunked for years — and that Michelangelo entrusted what remained of his works in his final years to his students to finish his projects. But Wallace disagreed with Salerno’s claim that a “huge treasure” of Michelangelo’s work had been secreted away and was therefore ripe for new discovery, arguing that Michelangelo was supervising multiple architectural projects in Rome at the time and that drawings he made were working sketches likely not preserved.
He also agreed that the existence of a secret chamber that can only be opened with three keys is new, the report said, but argued that scholarly treatment would require Salerno to transcribe the documents and submit the material for peer review. Outside the authentication debate, the report underscored that Italian authorities and church leaders framed the immediate issue as one of stewardship. Lt. Col. Paolo Salvatori said the asset belongs to the national heritage regardless of whether it can be attributed to Michelangelo, and he said it was hoped it would be defended as such, while the authenticity question remains unresolved.
Associated Press religion coverage receives support through the AP’s collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc.